Claimant Guide

Litigation Loans vs Litigation Funding

They sound similar and both pay for a case — but one is a debt you always repay, and the other is not. Here is the difference, in plain English.

A litigation loan is money borrowed to pay for a legal case. Like any loan it is usually recourse: it must be repaid with interest whether or not the case succeeds. Litigation funding is different — it is non-recourse, meaning the funder is only repaid out of a successful recovery, and if the case fails the claimant owes the funder nothing. The trade-off is that funding costs more as a share of a win, because the funder takes on the downside risk. This page is general information, not financial or legal advice.

Litigation loan vs litigation funding: the key differences

FeatureLitigation loanLitigation funding
If you loseLoan + interest still repayableYou owe the funder nothing
RecourseRecourse (personal liability)Non-recourse
Cost basisInterest, accruing over timeAgreed share of any recovery
Who carries case riskThe borrower (you)The funder
Best suited toShort, near-certain needs; bridgingStrong, higher-value claims where you want the downside removed

Types of litigation loan

  • Disbursement funding — borrowing to cover case expenses such as court fees, expert reports and counsel's fees, often used alongside a "no win, no fee" arrangement with a solicitor.
  • Consumer legal loans — personal borrowing to cover living costs while a claim is ongoing, more common in personal-injury contexts.
  • Law-firm lending — facilities that lend to a law firm against its book of cases; for the firm-side alternative see portfolio litigation funding.

Which is right for your claim?

A loan can make sense for a short, low-risk need — for example, bridging a defined cost you are confident of recovering quickly. But because a loan must be repaid whatever happens, and interest accrues the longer a case runs, the risk sits with you.

For strong, higher-value commercial claims — where the case may take years and the downside of losing would be painful — non-recourse litigation funding is often the better fit, because it transfers that downside to the funder. Use our guides to check whether a claim is likely to qualify: single-case funding and is my claim suitable?

Litigation outcomes are never guaranteed, and any funding or borrowing decision should follow independent legal and financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

Want funding without the downside?

Audley Capital arranges non-recourse litigation funding — if your case fails, you owe the funder nothing. Submit your case for a free, confidential assessment. Capital is at risk for funders and no outcome is guaranteed.

Speak to our team

Discuss your case, funding or investment

Tell us about your enquiry and the best time to reach you. No obligation — we typically respond within 24 hours.

By submitting you agree we may contact you about your enquiry. See our privacy policy.